SOURCE SCOPE ยท NOT LEGAL ADVICE

Law & guidance boundaries

Separate current law and guidance, case-derived lessons, and the proposed standard. Do not turn one into another.

Three labels

Every proposition has a source status.

CURRENT LAW / GUIDANCE

What a source states in scope

Use primary legal or agency material at its actual authority level and setting.

CASE-DERIVED LESSON

What a documented experience can teach

Use a specific record without converting it into precedent or a universal rule.

PROPOSED STANDARD

What this protocol proposes

NSMAEP, its tools, and the PMR are voluntary policy architecture, not existing law.

Current law / guidance

Keep agencies and source scope distinct.

DOJ

DOJ mobility-device guidance describes mobility-device categories and, in its powered-device context, actual-risk safety requirements and setting factors. It does not classify inline skates as OPDMDs or establish this full protocol.

Read DOJ mobility-device guidance

DOT / FTA

DOT and FTA provide transportation-specific authority and materials. Their relevance depends on the transportation setting and source scope.

Read the FTA BART determination

FTA BART determination

The 2007 FTA determination was fact-specific and environment-specific. It is not a universal device classification, skate approval, or skate prohibition.

See the bounded motivating case

Protocol boundary

What this site does not claim.

The Portable Mobility Record does not exist as a general federal certification program. The protocol is not a permit, a diagnosis framework, a legal entitlement, a mandatory mitigation rule, or a substitute for individualized review.